Sunday, February 28, 2016

Textual Poaching

See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil”

Eisen Bernardo, a Philippian graphic artist, did a series where magazines covers were juxtaposed on the top of famous and classical pieces of art. He described the project as “[a] way of giving homage to the magazines—as venue of human artistic expression and vehicle of popular culture." I was delighted and impressed by his work, and I felt inspired to take a similar artistic approach on my own project, but I applied it in a completely different way. I wanted to take this comparison and demonstrate an element of “popular culture” seen in the magazine and model industry—the objectification of women.
Growing up, I had little to no opinion about the sexual portrayal of women in the media. I took it in stride as a fact of life, thinking so little about it that I hardly recognized it when I saw it. It wasn’t until my first few years of college that I really became aware of its presence, as I witnessed it and even became victim to it on several occasions. Reflecting on why this topic had never really been addressed in my home, I wondered about how my mother was raised and what complacencies to sexism she inadvertently developed.
With Eisen’s magazine theme in mind, I researched images of photographers and paparazzi during the 1970s, when my mother would have been growing up. I was horrified by the invasive nature of the journalists and their one-dimensional goal to get a good picture. To me, these hoards of men were committing the definition of objectification. Their soul focus was on body, disregarding the subject’s thoughts, feelings, or personality. 
In Jenkin’s article on “How Texts Become Real,” he discusses how avid consumers often take the elements from a favorite text or media and detach them from their original source to create something they envision. For this reason I wanted to work with classical art, a symbol of the history of sexism, and the 70s paparazzi that represented the media influences my mother experienced. Together, they make a somewhat shocking comparison. I chose nude paintings to emphasize how the only censorship going on is of women’s communication and expression. 

I don't think my mother nor my grandmothers would share my perception on this issue. Whatever generational differences or exposures they experienced has led to very different social conclusions. I simply see sexism in places that they don't. My pieces represent my perspective, which is partially a result from my own experiences as well as observing the generations that have come before. 

Article No.1

Article No. 2


Article No. 3


Sunday, February 21, 2016

Constant Revival

Artist's Statement


“There is nothing new except what has been forgotten.”
—Marie Antoinette

National Geographic recently published an article on the world’s oldest known piece of clothing (Watson). The 5,000-year-old garment was discovered in an Egyptian tomb, but the interesting thing is, it looks like it could just as easily be found in a department store today.



The modern look of the piece prompted me to consider the fashion industry as a whole. A quick look into current trends revealed what some websites call a “90s revival” (Leaper). Vogue’s coverage of the upcoming season displays denim, chunky heels, sequins, and high wasted jeans, which is more than enough to induce flashbacks of shows like F.R.I.E.N.D.S. and Clueless.

This renewal of the past is hardly unexpected, however. During 2015, the bold prints and bohemian cuts screamed viva la hippie era (Ferla), and the 2013 fashion collections did the 1960s proud (“’60s Revival in Today’s Fashion!”). Granted, there are modern variations and adaptions with each release, but considering how our clothes today reflect 3,000 B.C., it’s undeniable that the fashion world operates on a cycle of reoccurring trends.



With this in mind, I felt inspired to comment. I chose to approach this element of fashion the way Scott McCloud did in his editorial on comics. McCloud used the very medium he was describing—the comic book—to show how the components of this art form come together. Likewise, I felt that the best way to remark on the repetitive nature of fashion design was to recreate a motif of the industry and do a stylized shoot. I limited myself to only using what I felt embodied the spirit of “la mode”—recyclable materials.

Each “fashion” piece was made from aluminum, steel, plastic, paper, or a combination of these. The earrings were built out of soda can tabs and connected by twist-ties. The collar was crafted using twisted plastic bottles strung together by a grocery bag handle. A crushed can made up the hairpiece, and as for the eyelashes, they were cut from a magazine. Last but not least, the backdrop of the photo was made entirely from paper advertisements. 

My reason behind my commentary isn’t necessarily to find fault with how the fashion world is run, but rather to point out that the recycling of ideas is a common trope that exists in the industry. In fact, it seems to be an inseparable element of the medium, and will likely continue that way. As John McCartney sang in his song, “Vintage Clothes”: “A little more, a little tall, check the rack/What went out is coming back.”


Il Se Recycle

Works Cited

Leaper, Caroline. “The Spring 2016 Trend Report: Your Ultimate Guide To The New
            Fashion Season.” Marieclaire.co.uk, 11 Feb. 2016. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.

Ferla, Ruth La. “The ‘70s are back in Fashion. Again.” Nytimes.com, 18 Mar. 2015.
Web. 21 Feb. 2016.

“Fashion Trends.” Vogue.co.uk. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.

Watson, Traci. “See the World’s Oldest Dress.” News.nationalgeographic.com, 18 Feb.
            2016. Web. 15 Feb. 2016.

“’60s Revival In Today’s Fashion! How To Do 60s MOD & Styles in 2013 Spring?”
Thefashiontag.com, 26 Mar. 2013. Web. 15 Feb. 2016.


Monday, February 8, 2016

Historical Script


Artists' Statement


The Epervier is based off the sea battle between the USS Peacock and the HMS Epervier 1 that took place during the war of 1812. As far as events are concerned, our approach to the historical material was fairly accurate. The transportation of a valuable cargo from Havana to Halifax, the mutinous crew, the complete dismantle of the HMS Epervier, and John Hackett’s serious injury are all things that actually happened.2 The history behind this battle was already so rich, we felt it was important to let the events stay relatively as they were. However for the sake of storytelling, we dramatized aspects of the history.

We embraced the setting, and did additional research in order to understand the hierarchy of the naval command and the layout of the ship. We wanted to keep that element as realistic as possible, and instead used our creative interpretation to develop the characters in the story. The dialogue utilizes language sailors at the time might have used (based on our research), along with period appropriate naval terms. Inspiration was drawn from the film “Master and Commander,” for the more proper navy culture and interactions between levels of ship hierarchy. For the mutiny and battle, the film “Pirates of the Caribbean” and the book “Treasure Island” are to be thanked, which illustrate a rich, though less realistic, drama of life at sea, and the thrilling possibilities of disagreements among crew members.  

John Hackett was a real officer that served on the Epervier, and who we chose to make our main protagonist. After reading reports of Hacketts bravery on the ship, he came across as quite the naval hero. However, we wondered if his sense of patriotic pride had ever been shaken, considering the trauma he experienced, or if he ever second-guessed his own commitment to the British service. We invented Kent to challenge Hacketts original viewpoints and serve as a sort of character foil. At a time when mutiny was a crime punishable by death, we wanted this character committing high treason to offer some realistic insight on the personal cost of war, which Hackett later comes to recognize as true.  
In class we discussed the importance of having a reason behind the stories we tell, and we wanted this script to have more significance than just the recount of a sea battle. So we added a political and moral tension between the characters of Hackett and Kent. They represent a greater historical theme or significance. We wanted to use the characters as a way to address the struggle soldiers have when they lack patriotism or loyalty, but have no option but to join their country’s armed forces. For class we read The Veil, which showed the unique perspective of a French Islamic girl during political movements in France. In a similar way, we wanted to represent the less examined outlook of naval sailors who had to fight in wars they may have disagreed with, Kent serving as a voice for those men.

By Amy and Emily


Endnotes

1 Joseph Allen, Battles of the British Navy (London: Henry G. Bohn, York Street, Covent Garden, 1852), 457.

2 William James, The Naval History of Great Britain: From the Declaration of war by France in 1793 to the Accession of George IV (London, 1824), 128.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bxx3jQusy5JYV180Q2dIbko4UFk/view



Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Process Piece


Speaking is like uniqueness. Louis Armstrong is known for his musical talents on brass instruments in jazz bands all across the world. But what makes him unique is his voice. Most people who listen to a vast array of music are able to recognize his voice. What we don’t always recognize is that Louis probably had a vocal disorder. But who really cared? His voice is so characteristic that he was able to make his uniqueness his strength. The voice of a person defines who they are, and adds to their overall character. Thus making everyone, in their own respects, unique. In fact, this is why we found reason in finding out this process. It all started with zoning out in class while we were watching a video. From a simple ignorance, we were able to find beauty in such a simple process.
Speaking is like The trump card.  NPR did a radio broadcast about how we have the trump card of all animals because we have been able to master using our lungs and vocal chords to make coherent sounds. They go into the anatomy (and honestly beauty) of the human vocal abilities, then compare them against other animals. This elevates a level of communication that no other animals in the entire planet have been able to master. Once we take all of this into account, we are better able to appreciate God and his mastery of creating. Take that Chimpanzees.
Speaking is like a symphony. Think of it, for the voice to create sound waves, it has to vibrate the vocal chords. Compare that to the buzzing of your lips into a mouthpiece of an instrument. The buzzing produces sounds with high pitches or low pitches that are fantastic. So fantastic that someone, somewhere decided to put many voices together and create a human symphony. Some people call this a choir, but feel free to call it what you will. The voice is beautiful (not referring to any television shows)
Speaking is like elegance. On the other hand, we can also lift people up. We can bestow honor and glory and fame to someone, anyone. We can say something fluffy or bold, pretty or inadequate. Over the years though, we have encountered eloquent speech. Take the scripture study video for example: The unscripted narration is so unadorned, we could compare it to a small orchestra. Though what they say is but simple, it could have a lasting effect upon each of us. Thus rings the proverb true: The pen (your words) are mightier than the sword

Speaking is like me.